IC-1053Instruction tuning suppresses in-context learning in LLaMA, Vicuna, and OPT-IML, with the suppression being largest for English prompts and partially recoverable via translation to other languages

Report a problem with this record

Suhas Kotha, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Aditi Raghunathan

SourceUnderstanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inference

The paper constructs a controlled prompt where in-context exemplars define a latent task (repeat or capitalize) but the final query is phrased as an instruction (math or fill-in-the-blank). Pretrained models (LLaMA-7B, OPT-1.3B) perform the ICL task, while their instruction-tuned counterparts (Alpaca, Vicuna-7B, OPT-IML-1.3B) follow the instruction instead. The drop in ICL accuracy is largest in English (56.75% for Alpaca, 40.00% for Vicuna, 21.00% for OPT-IML) and much smaller in French, Spanish, Dutch, Hungarian, leetspeak, or Pig Latin. For example, Alpaca's ICL drop under leetspeak is only 1.0% versus 56.75% in English.

Evidence
correlational
Key metric
Alpaca ICL drop: 56.75% (English), 29.00% (French), 47.75% (Spanish), 51.00% (Dutch), 45.75% (Hungarian), 1.50% (leetspeak), 13.50% (Pig Latin); Vicuna ICL drop: 33.00% (English), 19.50% (French), 11.00% (Spanish), 39.00% (Dutch), 36.50% (Hungarian), 1.00% (leetspeak), 25.00% (Pig Latin); OPT-IML ICL drop: 21.00% (English), 9.25% (French), 5.25% (Spanish), 5.75% (Dutch), 4.25% (Hungarian), 4.00% (leetspeak), 10.00% (Pig Latin)
Caveat
Translation is implemented via Google Translate and may introduce errors; the paper notes that translation can violate invertibility for tasks requiring contextual knowledge that varies across languages. Evaluation is limited to first-word completion accuracy over 400 samples and 4 ICL vs IF task combinations.
Model
LLaMA, Alpaca, Vicuna, OPT OPT-IML
Concepts
Failure mode
Related findings
IC-1054, IC-1055
Extraction
automatic-extraction