IC-277Open-source VLMs show a clear scaling trend in both average accuracy and reasoning robustness on DynaMath, with larger models performing substantially better

Report a problem with this record

Chengke Zou, Xingang Guo, Rui Yang, Junyu Zhang, Bin Hu, Huan Zhang

SourceDynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Models

Among open-source models, increasing parameter size consistently improves both average-case accuracy and reasoning robustness. Qwen2-VL improves from 42.1% (7B) to 55.1% (72B) average accuracy, and InternVL2 improves from 39.7% (8B) to 54.0% (76B). The paper notes that closed-source models demonstrate greater robustness than open-source models overall, but within the open-source group, reasoning robustness scales with model size. Qwen2-VL-72B and InternVL2-76B outperform Gemini Pro 1.5 on reasoning robustness.

Evidence
correlational
Key metric
Qwen2-VL: 42.1% (7B) to 55.1% (72B) average accuracy; InternVL2: 39.7% (8B) to 54.0% (76B) average accuracy. Reasoning robustness (RR): Qwen2-VL-72B 51.8%, InternVL2-76B 45.8%, Gemini Pro 1.5 44.5%.
Caveat
The scaling trend is observed only within two model families (Qwen2-VL and InternVL2) and only up to 76B parameters; it is not established whether the trend continues beyond this range.
Model
Qwen2-VL Qwen2-VL-7B, Qwen2-VL-72B, InternVL2 InternVL2-8B, InternVL2-26B, InternVL2-40B, InternVL2-76B, Gemini 1.5 / Gemini Pro 1.5
Concepts
Scale-dependent behaviour
Datasets
DynaMath [eval]
Related findings
IC-276, IC-278
Extraction
automatic-extraction