IC-315CoT prompting (reasoning + instruction) yields larger relative gains for larger LLMs and harder problems in competitive code generation, with the effect reversing for the most capable models
Kunhao Zheng, Juliette Decugis, Jonas Gehring, Taco Cohen, benjamin negrevergne, Gabriel Synnaeve
The paper grid-searches 8 reasoning prompts and 6 instruction prompts across Llama 3.0/3.1 (8B, 70B, 405B) and GPT-4o on CodeContests and TACO. The best reasoning+instruction combination improves pass@100 by +5.0% for Llama 3.0 8B, +9.3% for Llama 3.0 70B, +3.3% for Llama 3.1 8B, and +5.2% for Llama 3.1 70B. On the TACO very-hard split, Llama 3.0 8B pass@100 nearly doubles (2.1% to 3.9%). However, for Llama 3.1 405B, CoT degrades pass@1 by 2.7 points, and for GPT-4o, multi-turn alone degrades pass 1@3 by 4.5 points, indicating the benefit reverses at the top of the scale.
Llama 3.1 405B and GPT-4o evaluated only in small sampling regimes (pass@1, pass 1@3) due to compute constraints; no single prompt combination works best across all models and sample sizes.