IC-319Different CLIP backbones exhibit distinct robustness profiles to specific image perturbations, with each architecture being most resilient to a different transformation

Cristian Rodriguez-Opazo, Ehsan Abbasnejad, Damien Teney, Hamed Damirchi, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Anton van den Hengel

SourceSynergy and Diversity in CLIP: Enhancing Performance Through Adaptive Backbone Ensembling

The paper applies five image transformations (resize, flip, grayscale, color jitter, gaussian blur) to subsets of each benchmark's test set and measures the accuracy drop for each of the 9 CLIP backbones. The results show that no single backbone is uniformly most robust: RN50 and ViT-B/16 are most resilient to flip, RN50x64 to resize, RN50x16 to grayscale, and ViT-L/14 and ViT-L/14-336 to color jitter and gaussian blur. This indicates that the backbones' ability to handle out-of-distribution inputs varies widely and is architecture-specific.

Evidence
correlational
Key metric
Delta accuracy (Table B.2): resize best RN50x64 -1.25; flip best RN50 +0.12; grayscale best RN50x16 -5.98; color jitter best ViT-L/14 -1.67; gaussian blur best ViT-L/14-336 -1.80
Caveat
Transformations are applied to a subset of each test set, not the full set. The paper does not test adversarial or natural distribution shifts in this experiment (those are covered separately for NLC in Section E).
Model
CLIP / CLIP-ViT (LC)
Concepts
Scale-dependent behaviour
Datasets
ImageNet-1k / ImageNet / ImageNet-1k-val / ImageNet-Val [eval], EuroSAT [eval], DTD [eval]
Related findings
IC-318
Extraction
automatic-extraction