IC-420CLIP ViT-B/16's SAE latent interpretability is depth-dependent: layer 11 encodes semantic object concepts while layers 2, 5, and 8 encode local shapes and attention patterns

Report a problem with this record

Hyesu Lim, Jinho Choi, Jaegul Choo, Steffen Schneider

SourceSparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptation

The authors train separate PatchSAEs on CLIP ViT-B/16's residual stream at layers 2, 5, 8, and 11. Qualitative inspection of reference images and segmentation masks shows that layer 11 latents represent semantic concepts (e.g., 'golden gate bridge'), layer 8 and 5 latents capture geometric shapes (e.g., 'triangle shape of the object'), and layer 2 latents are less interpretable, activated by local token attention rather than global semantics. The SAE training metrics also differ: L0 (active latents) ranges from 148.56 (layer 11) to 298.97 (layer 5).

Evidence
observational
Caveat
The depth-dependent interpretability finding is qualitative (based on reference image inspection) and reported in the appendix; no quantitative interpretability metric is provided to compare layers.
Model
CLIP / CLIP-ViT (LC)
Concepts
Depth-dependent structure
Datasets
ImageNet-1k / ImageNet / ImageNet-1k-val / ImageNet-Val [train]
Related findings
IC-419
Extraction
automatic-extraction